Stephen Scott King was admitted to the California Bar 10th January 1963, but is now resigned. Stephen graduated from UCLA SOL.

Lawyer Information

NameStephen Scott King
First Admitted10 January 1963 (61 years, 8 months ago)
StatusResigned
Bar Number33489

Contact

Phone Number818-907-6389
Fax Number818-610-7686

Schools

Law SchoolUCLA SOL (Los Angeles CA)
Undergraduate SchoolUniversity of California at Los Angeles (CA)

Address

Current AddressPMB 1006, 14622 Ventura Blvd
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Map

History

14 June 2001Resigned (23 years, 3 months ago)
Resignation with charges pending 01-Q-01047
26 March 2001Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 5 months ago)
Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) 01-Q-01047
18 December 2000Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 8 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 95-O-17209
27 November 2000Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 00-O-14722 (23 years, 9 months ago)
21 September 2000Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 00-N-13766 (23 years, 11 months ago)
3 August 2000Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 1 month ago)
24 October 1999Active (24 years, 10 months ago)
24 September 1999Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 11 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 95-O-17209
11 March 1998Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-O-17209 (26 years, 6 months ago)
24 October 1990Public reproval 88-O-11346 (33 years, 10 months ago)
29 November 1989Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 88-O-11346 (34 years, 9 months ago)
10 January 1963Admitted to the State Bar of California (61 years, 8 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

August 3, 2000

STEPHEN SCOTT KING [#33489], 63, of Los Angeles was placed on interim suspension Aug. 3, 2000, following his conviction of one count of grand theft by embezzlement. He was ordered to comply with rule 955.

September 24, 1999

STEPHEN S. KING [#33489], 62, of Santa Monica was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on five years of probation with an actual 30-day suspension, and was ordered to take the MPRE within a year. The order took effect Sept. 24, 1999.

King stipulated to misconduct in three consolidated cases, and two other cases were dismissed.

In the first case, King represented a doctor in a divorce and five other matters. He did not notify the doctor for three months that he had received $15,000 from the sale of his client’s residence. Because King was representing the doctor in other matters, he mistakenly believed he had the authorization to sign the client’s name on the check and deposit it in his client trust account. King then took the $15,000 and applied it toward fees the doctor purportedly owed on the other cases.

King stipulated that he failed to maintain client funds pending their authorized distribution, and he failed to notify a client of the receipt of funds.

King prepared and filed a lawsuit against another client’s former attorney, but he did not file an answer to a summons and complaint or request a time extension. As a result, a default judgment was entered against his client. King stipulated that he acted with gross negligence in failing to perform legal services for his client. In mitigation, he succeeded in getting the default set aside.

In a third matter, he represented a client in a slip and fall claim which settled for $25,000. Because the client’s expenses exceeded the amount of the settlement, King negotiated reduced fees with her medical providers. However, it took him nine months to distribute the settlement proceeds.

In mitigation, King has an extensive background in teaching and lecturing in law schools for 30 years, has been active in professional groups involved with family law, and has served as both an arbitrator and a judge pro tem in the Los Angeles courts.